Developer of location based application, a frontend specialist for Google Maps API and page optimization.

psykmedia

timestamp: 1268255895

// Articles I have just read

// CSS3 Please! Instant results… Thank You

css3please

Paul Irish and Jonathan Neal have created a fun example of various CSS tweaks that you can make, and see the results instantly.

CSS3, Please! lets you play with fancy new rules such as:

  • border-radius
  • box shadow
  • gradients
  • rgba support in backgrounds
  • transforms
  • font-face

Really nice way to make tweaks inline in the page….. nicely done. Hope to see some other examples out there :)

Kategorien: Google Reader

// Google Says Goodbye to API Keys with New Geocoding API

Google MapsGoogle has released a new geocoding web service that is sure to bring a smile to map mashup developers working with the Google Maps API. Announced this week on the Google Geo Developers Blog, version 3 of the popular geocoding web service has been released, with several improvements and new features that will make it easier geolocate addresses. The new geocoding web service shares many of the geocoding improvements included with v3 of the Google Maps API:

  • A flatter response format for address components that is easier to parse
  • The ability to tag an address component with multiple types
  • Both full names and abbreviations for countries and states
  • Differentiation between rooftop and interpolated geocoder results
  • Both the bounding box and recommended viewport for each result

As with the previous version (which is now deprecated), the new version of the geocoding web service supports reverse geocoding and it provides a RESTful API that returns results in either JSON or XML. The latest set of documentation includes additional discussion of the address component types and feature geometries returned with each result. Note that in contrast to the v2 service, the new geocoding service does not provide an accuracy “score” attribute, but rather results with a set of address components (e.g., intersection, postal code, etc.) and a location type for the feature geometry that indicates the accuracy and precision (e.g., rooftop, range interpolated, geometric center, etc.).

Perhaps one of the most exciting new features is the elimination of the need to use an API key to issue requests to the geocoding service (although URL signing is required for Maps API Premiere customers). In lieu of the API key requirement, new geocoding request limits are also in effect, with a 2,500 daily request limit per IP address. If you’re unsure about the best approach to using client-side versus server-side geocoding Mano Marks has a recent post that outlines some good strategies.

This is a nice and worthwhile improvement to a valuable web service that map mashup developers have come to rely on for a variety of needs. We’re looking forward to seeing how developers leverage the new service for the thousands of map mashups out there that use the Google Maps API.

Related ProgrammableWeb Resources

Google Maps Google Maps API Profile, 1919 mashups

Kategorien: Google Reader

// Flash and Standards: The Cold War of the Web

You’ve probably heard that Apple recently released the iPad. The absence of Flash Player on the device seems to have awakened the HTML5 vs. Flash debate. Apparently, it’s the final nail in the coffin for Flash. Either that, or the HTML5 community is overhyping its still nascent markup language update. The arguments run wide, strong, and legitimate on both sides. Yet both sides might also be wrong. Designer/developer Dan Mall is equally adept at web standards and Flash; what matters, he says, isn't technology, but people.contact.us@alistapart.com (Dan Mall)05202933678100281120038233189715608051440132602886449821553914947897033010822897026665682277968008361736528485931647586210181871658268992771007945377831609623780226116404080343710306868924404498633765177009889095347291860548821133395693243303979572716026296478113927871037145344340756747439562776067505221790502551658316064686066785648000310107890991197529744317931167125175523751092956347940201094380976424275869970853318388188331455649173117066820192316431090411495187752736985716149705036331882415
Kategorien: Google Reader

// Introducing the new Google Geocoding Web Service

Geocoding - finding the geographical location of a given address - is one of the most popular features of the Google Maps API. Both the JavaScript Maps APIs and the Maps API for Flash include classes that enable applications to perform geocoding, and there is also a RESTful web service that offers the option of making geocoding requests from server side applications with output in both XML and JSON.

The Google Maps JavaScript API v3 introduced a new format for geocoding responses that offers a number of improvements over the format used in the v2 API:

  • A flatter response format for address components that is easier to parse
  • The ability to tag an address component with multiple types
  • Both full names and abbreviations for countries and states
  • Differentiation between rooftop and interpolated geocoder results
  • Both the bounding box and recommended viewport for each result
We're happy to now announce a new Geocoding Web Service that adopts these improvements.

The Geocoding Web Service is intended to enable precaching of geocoder results that you know your application will need in the future. For example, if your application displays property listings, you can geocode the address of each property, cache the results on your server, and serve these locations to your API application. This ensures that your application does not need to geocode the address of a property every time it is viewed by a user. However we do ask that you regularly refresh your cache of geocoder results.

Note however that it is a requirement of the Maps API Terms of Service that you use the Geocoding Web Service in conjunction with a Google map. This means that when it comes time to use cached geocoder results in an application, the application must display the results or any data derived from them on a map generated using one of the Google Maps APIs or Google Earth API.

If your application needs to geocode arbitrary addresses that are entered by your users while they wait we recommend that you use the classes in the appropriate client API. This ensures that the requests your application generates reach Google directly from your users, which will improve the performance of your application and ensure it is resilient to unexpected spikes in use. For more details, I highly recommend this excellent blog post by our very own Mano Marks.

In addition to an improved response format you will notice some other changes in the new Geocoding Web Service. Requests no longer require a Maps API key, and Maps API Premier customers must sign their requests. In addition CSV output is not supported because we found that the minimal amount of data in a CSV response makes it is difficult to identify false positive results.

2,500 requests may be sent to the Geocoding Web Service per day from a single IP address. This is independent of any geocoding activity generated by applications using one of the client Maps APIs for geocoding. Maps API Premier quotas remain unchanged.

A forward geocoding request to the new Geocoding Web Service with XML output looks like:

http://maps.google.com/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=sydney&sensor=false

A reverse geocoding request with JSON output looks like:

http://maps.google.com/maps/api/geocode/json?latlng=-33.873038,151.20563&sensor=false

Check out the Geocoding Web Service documentation for more details on the options available for language and biasing of results.

In conjunction with the launch of the new Geocoding Web Service we are also announcing the deprecation of the current service, now retroactively named the "Geocoding V2 Web Service". Existing applications using the V2 Web Service need not worry though. Deprecation indicates that we no longer intend to pursue any further feature development, but we will continue to maintain and support the service in accordance with the deprecation policy set out in the Maps API Terms of Service.

We hope that you find the new Geocoding Web Service easier to use and useful. As always we encourage you to check out the Google Maps API Google Group if you have any questions or comments relating to the APIs. We look forward to adding more great features to the Geocoding Web Service in future.

Posted by Thor Mitchell, Maps API Product Manager

Kategorien: Google Reader

// Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

Smashing-magazine-advertisement in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location
 in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location  in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location  in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

I thought I could not be out-geeked. With a background in radio, and having dabbled in the demo scene on the Commodore 64 and hung out on BBSes and IRC for a long time and all the other things normal kids don’t quite get, I thought I was safe in this area.

Then I went to my first WhereCamp, an unconference dealing with geographical issues and how they relate to the world of Web development. Even my A-Levels in Astronomy did not help me there. I was out-geeked by the people who drive and tweak the things that we now consider normal about geo-location on the Web.

Pulling out your phone, find your location and getting directions to the nearest bar is easy, but a lot of work has gone into making that possible. The good news is that because of that effort, mere geo-mortals like you and me can now create geographically aware products using a few lines of code. So, let’s give the geo-community a big hand.

[Offtopic: By the way, did you know that Smashing Magazine has a mobile version? Try it out if you have an iPhone, Blackberry or another capable device.]

Why Geo Matters

First of all, why is it important to consider physical location on this planet (at this moment) when we develop Web products? There are a few answers to this.

The first answer is mobility. The days of people sitting in front of desktop machines at home are over. Sales of mobile devices, laptops and netbooks have overtaken those of bulky stationary computers in the last few years. The power of processors now allows us to use smaller, more mobile hardware to perform the same tasks. So, if people use their hardware on the go, we should bring our systems to them. Which brings us to the second—very important—point: relevance.

Giving the user content that is relevant to the physical space they are in at the moment makes a lot of sense. We are creatures of habit. While we love the reach of the Internet, we also want to be able to find things in our local area easily: people to meet, cafes to frequent, interesting buildings and museums to learn about. The advertising industry—especially of the adult and dating variety—realized this years ago. I am sure you have come across one of the following before:

Adultpersonals in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

I am sure these ads are more successful than the ones that show only user names. That the photos and names are the same for every location doesn’t seem to be a problem (but yes, I noticed it). So how does it all work?

Getting The User’s Location Via IP

Every computer on a network has a number that identifies it: its IP address. The Internet is nothing but a massive network, and your IP number is assigned to you by the service provider that you have used to connect to that network. Because the numbers that service providers assign change from one geographical location to the next (much like telephone numbers), you can make quite a good estimate of where your visitors are from.

To find out where a certain phone number is from, you use a phone book. To find out where an IP is from, you can use the Maxmind GeoIP database. Maxmind also provides a JavaScript solution that you can use on websites:

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://j.maxmind.com/app/geoip.js"></script> <script> var info = document.getElementById('info'); var lat = geoip_latitude(); var lon = geoip_longitude(); var city = geoip_city(); var out = '<h3>Information from your IP</h3>'+ '<ul>'+ '<li>Latitude: ' + lat + '</li>'+ '<li>Longitude: ' + lon + '</li>'+ '<li>City: ' + city + '</li>'+ '<li>Region: ' + geoip_region() + '</li>'+ '<li>Region Name: ' + geoip_region_name() + '</li>'+ '<li>Postal Code: ' + geoip_postal_code() + '</li>'+ '<li>Country Code: ' + geoip_country_code() + '</li>'+ '<li>Country Name: ' + geoip_country_name() + '</li>'+ '</ul>' info.innerHTML = out; </script>

Geolocation in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

This gives you some information on the user (try it out for yourself). The challenge, though, is relevance. Your IP location is the location of the IP that your provider has assigned to you. Depending on your provider, this could be quite a ways off (in my case, I live in London, but my provider used to show me as living in Rochester). Another problem is if you work for a company that uses a VPN. At Yahoo, for example, I have to connect to the VPN to read my company email, and I have to choose a location to connect to:

Vpn in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

So, for a solution like the one highlighted above, I would show up as being in a totally different part of the world (which might be useful for watching Internet TV in the UK while I am in the US). IP geo-location, then, is an approximation, not a dead-on science.

Getting The User’s Location Via The W3C Geo API

Guessing geographical location via IP is possible, but it can also be pretty creepy. Being able to take advantage of your location is useful, but security-conscious users and people who are generally suspicious of the Internet are not happy with the idea of their movements being monitored by a computer. This makes sense: if I can monitor your whereabouts day and night, I would know where and when to rob your house without you being there.

There are a lot of solutions to the challenge of having good-quality geo-location and maintaining privacy. Google Gears has a geo-location service; Plazes helps you store your location; and Yahoo’s Fire Eagle is probably the most polished way to securely maintain your location on the Web.

The problem with all of these services is that they require the user to either install a plug-in or visit a Web service to update their location. This is not fun; browsers should do the work for you.

We now have a W3C recommendation for a geo-location API that allows browsers to request the geographical location of the user. This makes it less creepy, and you get real data back.

Firefox 3.5 and above supports the W3C geo-location API. So does Safari on the iPhone if you run OS 3.0 or above. If you use the API, the browser will ask the user whether they want to share their location with your website.

Geowarning in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

Once the user allows you to get their location, you get much more detailed latitude and longitude values. Using the API is very easy:

// if the browser supports the w3c geo api if(navigator.geolocation){ // get the current position navigator.geolocation.getCurrentPosition( // if this was successful, get the latitude and longitude function(position){ var lat = position.coords.latitude; var lon = position.coords.longitude; }, // if there was an error function(error){ alert('ouch'); }); }

Compare the IP and W3C solutions side by side. As you can see, there can be quite a difference in measuring the visitor’s location. The extent of the difference is shown in the following demo:

Difference in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

Converting Latitude And Longitude Back Into A Name

Having more information is nice, but we have lost the name of the city and all the other nice data that came with the Maxmind database. Because the location has changed, we cannot just grab that old data; we have to find a way to convert latitude and longitude coordinates into a name. This process is called “reverse geo-coding,” and several services on the Web allow you to do it. Probably the most well-known is the geo-names Web service, but it has a few issues. For starters, the results are very US-centric.

One freely available but lesser-known reverse geo-coder that works worldwide comes from a surprising source: Flickr. The flickr.places.findByLatLon service returns a location from a latitude and longitude coordinates. You can try it out in the app explorer, but by far the easiest way to use it is by using the Yahoo Query Language (or YQL). YQL deserves its own article, but let’s just say that, instead of having to authenticate with the Flickr API and read the docs, reverse geo-coding becomes as easy as this:

select * from flickr.places where lat=37.416115 and lon=-122.0245671

Using the YQL Web service, you can get the result back as XML or JSON. So, to use the service in JavaScript, all you need is the following:

<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> function getPlaceFromFlickr(lat,lon,callback){ // the YQL statement var yql = 'select * from flickr.places where lat='+lat+' and lon='+lon; // assembling the YQL webservice API var url = 'http://query.yahooapis.com/v1/public/yql?q='+ encodeURIComponent(yql)+'&format=json&diagnostics='+ 'false&callback='+callback; // create a new script node and add it to the document var s = document.createElement('script'); s.setAttribute('src',url); document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(s); }; // callback in case there is a place found function output(o){ if(typeof(o.query.results.places.place) != 'undefined'){ alert(o.query.results.places.place.name); } } // call the function with my current lat/lon getPlaceFromFlickr(37.416115,-122.02456,'output'); </script>

Combine that with the other services, and we get a more detailed result and can put a name to the coordinates:

Reversegeocode in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

The Trouble With Latitude And Longitude

While latitude and longitude coordinates are a good way to describe a location on Earth, it is also ambiguous. The coordinates could represent either the centre of a city or a point of interest (such as a museum or a pub) in that spot.

WOEID to the Rescue

To work around the problem, Yahoo and Flickr (and soon will Twitter) support another way to pinpoint a location. The Where On Earth Identifier (or WOEID) is a more granular way to describe locations on Earth. Because Flickr supports it, we can easily get get photos from a particular area:

select * from flickr.photos.search where woe_id in ( select place.woeid from flickr.places where lat=37.416115 and lon=-122.02456 )

Using this and a few lines of JavaScript, showing geo-located photos is pretty easy:

Geolocated-photos in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

This has also been wrapped in a simple-to-use YQL solution. The following code will display 10 photos of Paris:

<script> function photos(o){ var container = document.getElementById('photos'); container.innerHTML = o.results; } </script> <script src="http://query.yahooapis.com/v1/public/yql?q= select%20*%20from%20flickr.photolist%20where%20location%3D%22paris%2Cfr %22%20and%20text%3D%22%22%20and%20amount%3D10&format=xml& env=store%3A%2F%2Fdatatables.org%2Falltableswithkeys&callback=photos">

You can also play with this in the YQL console.

Why Not Search For The Location’s Name?

The main question about implementations such as the one above is why couldn’t we just do a search on Flickr for the city, instead of doing all the complex geo-lookups? The reason is false positives. Take Paris, for example: if you want to show photos of Paris on a travel website, you don’t want Paris Hilton to show up in there. Same goes for Jack London. You may also want to show photos of London, England, not London, Ontario. Geographic data is full of these kinds of gotchas, and the term for finding the right one is “disambiguation.” See the Wikipedia article on “Victoria” to see just how many geographical contexts this term can have.

Turning Text Into Geo-Data

Finding a visitor’s geographic location is all well and good, but it doesn’t mean much if you can’t link it to information for that area. This is where it gets tricky. For Flickr (and soon Twitter), this is easy, because both services are able to attach geographical locations to the content you put in them. This is not so for most of the information on the Web, though, and this is when we resort to clever algorithms, machine-learning, pattern-matching and all the other think-tank stuff that computers and the scientists in front of them do.

Say you want to identify the geographical locations that a particular text or Web page talks about. Yahoo offers a service for that called Placemaker, and it is pretty easy to use. You need to get a developer key and send this as appid, send a text as documentContent, define the type of the text as documentType and define the type of data you want back as outputType. All of this needs to be sent as a POST to http://wherein.yahooapis.com/v1/document:

<form action="http://wherein.yahooapis.com/v1/document" method="post"> <textarea id="text" name="documentContent">Hi there, I am Chris. I live in London, I am currently in Sunnyvale and will soon be in Atlanta and Las Vegas.</textarea> <div><input type="submit" name="sub" value="get locations"></div> <input type="hidden" name="appid" value="{YOUR_APP_ID}"> <input type="hidden" name="documentType" value="text/plain"> <input type="hidden" name="outputType" value="xml"> </form>

You can try this out yourself. Using PHP to call the API instead of a simple form, you can even format the output nicely. See it in action here:

Placemaker-results in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

While developers who have played around with Web services won’t find Placemaker hard to use, the service can be daunting for the average developer. That is why I built GeoMaker some time ago. GeoMaker allows you to enter a text or URL, select the locations you want to include in the final outcome, and get the locations either as a map to copy and paste or as micro-formats.

Geomaker in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

However, because there is also a YQL solution for using PlaceMaker in JavaScript, we can do the same with a few lines of client-side code to enhance an HTML document. Check out the following example:

Textandmap in Entering The Wonderful World of Geo Location

To use this, you need three things: a text with geographical locations in them in an element with an ID, a Google Maps API key (which you can get here) and the following few lines of code:

<script src="http://github.com/codepo8/geotoys/raw/master/addmap.js"></script> <script> addmap.config.mapkey = 'COPY YOUR API KEY HERE'; addmap.analyse('content'); </script>

This makes it incredibly easy to give your visitors a sense of what part of the world a text is related to.

Adding Maps To Your Documents

Online maps have been around for a while now (and Google Maps was instrumental in the rise of AJAX), and many providers out there allow you to add maps to your documents. Google is probably the leader, but Yahoo also has maps, as does Microsoft and many more. There is even a fully open map service called Open Street Maps, which has been instrumental in the recent rescue efforts in Haiti.

If you want interactive maps, probably the easiest thing to use is Mapstraction, which is a JavaScript library that does away with the discrepancies between the various map providers and gives you a single interface for all of them. 24ways published a good introduction to it three years ago.

Probably the simplest way to show a map that supports markers and paths in your document without having to dive into JavaScript is the Google static maps API. It creates maps as images, and all you need to do is provide the map information in the src URI of the image. For example, in the script example above, this would be:

http://maps.google.com/maps/api/staticmap? sensor=false &size=200x200 &maptype=roadmap &key=YOUR_MAP_KEY &markers=color:blue|label:1|37.4447,-122.161 &markers=color:blue|label:2|37.3385,-121.886 &markers=color:blue|label:3|37.3716,-122.038 &markers=color:blue|label:4|37.7792,-122.42

You can define the size and type of the map. If all you provide is the location of markers, the API will automatically find the right zoom level and area to ensure that all markers are visible. Google’s website even offers a detailed tool to create static maps, including markers and paths.

Geo Is A Space To Watch

I hope this has given you some insight into all of the things you can do to bring the earth to your product and to put your product on the map. Geo-location and geo-aware services are already huge, and they’ll be even more important this year. There will be more services—some mobile providers are ready to roll out new hardware and software—and now you can be a part of it.

What the geo-world needs now is a designer’s eye, and this is where you can help the geo-geeks create apps that matter, that look great and that make a difference in our visitors’ lives. For inspiration, check out Mapumental, which allows you to pinpoint a place to live in London, or see how Google Earth and some 3-D Objects allow you to race a milk truck on real map data.

(al)

© Christian Heilmann for Smashing Magazine, 2010. | Permalink | 48 comments | Add to del.icio.us | Digg this | Stumble on StumbleUpon! | Tweet it! | Submit to Reddit | Forum Smashing Magazine
Post tags:

Kategorien: Google Reader

// CommonJS - A YAGNI Based &quot;require&quot;

I am very busy these days with my last (hopefully) moving into my new and completely empty rented flat ... and while I am building home utilities and preparing my last post about A Better JS Class, with some extra case where common libraries fail with their parent implementations, I would like to quickly share this require function I wrote days ago but just recently came back in front of my eyes.

Why requireIn CommonJS we have different techniques and agreement about how developers should structure/organize their namespaces and libraries.
The first common function adopted from CommonJS "followers" is the require one. This function aim is to load once, and runtime, a namespace, allowing scripts loaded via this function to define exported properties/variables or methods/functions.

// file main.js
var $ = require("jquery").$;

// file jquery.js
// let's imagine jQuery library has this piece of code inside
if ( typeof exports != "undefined" ) {
// export the library as dollar function
exports.$ = jQuery;
}


The require Function
var require = (function (
global, // global scope object (not necessary window)
cache, // object with loaded namespace to avoid reloads
exports, // variable name (better compression)
ActiveXObject // property name (better compression)
) {
/*!WebReflection:MitStyle*/
function request(namespace) {
// create the xhr object, no need to optimize
// this check is nothing compared with the time
// required to load and evaluate the resource
var xhr = new global[global[ActiveXObject] ? ActiveXObject : "XMLHttpRequest"]("Microsoft.XMLHTTP");
xhr.open(
// method
"GET",
// path replaced
(require.root || "") + "/" + namespace.replace(/\./g, "/") + ".js",
// synchronous
false
);
// send request
xhr.send(null);
// assign the runtime created export object
// with the required namespace
return (cache[namespace] = Function(
exports,
// the text will be evaluated in a global function
// it can register exported variables/methods
// simply writing:
// export.$ = {};
// so that require("mylib").$; will always
// point to the correct property
xhr.responseText + ";return " + exports
// be sure the function is executed
// with a global context (the this reference)
).call(global, {}));
}
// if namespace has been loaded already
// the associated export object will be returned
// otherwise the precedent function will be
// executed
function require(namespace) {
return cache[namespace] || request(namespace);
}
// the exposed function
return require;
}(this, {}, "exports", "ActiveXObject"));

Above piece of code fit into about 350 bytes once minified, less than 260 bytes gzipped ... sweet, isn't it?
Bear in mind if we need a root, we can simply add it via require.root = "./my/js/path"; without last slash after the final folder (e.g. require.root="." to load from the current one).

YAGNI In DetailsFor those unable to understand the acronym, YAGNI simply means "Ya ain't gonna need it".
The YAGNI behind my proposal could be summarized in this way:
  • server side frameworks have their own native require, no need to fully replicate it, it's already there
  • simply Ajax, if the browser does not load via other protocols and you are testing, enable file: via about:confing/strict or the local support for XHR
  • the most used case is the one we all know, require function will be there, as global one, and module object is not yet important (CommonJS is constantly updated as well)
  • A well organized namespace will improbably affect object properties (e.g. Object.prototype["my.name.space"] does not make much sense). No need to use hasOwnProperty, specially not the object itself one, since Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty could be redefined without problems and most probably this is an edge case more dangerous than the prototype["my.long.namespace"]

All these points are better considered in another version I did not know, the one from David Flanagan.
In any case, we should consider this valid point of view about require and JavaScript client, from Lucas Smith.
At least now we have more alternatives in the field, with this one that should simply bite others at least for size, and for common case reliability.
Enjoy!
Kategorien: Google Reader

// WebPagetest.org – top tool

I’m loving WebPagetest.org. In Even Faster Web Sites I said, “[WebPagetest] hasn’t gotten the wide adoption it deserves.” It got a boost after Matt Cutts mentioned WebPageTest.org in his interview with WebProNews. But I still meet people who aren’t aware that this great performance tool is out there, so let me bang their drum some more.

Pat Meenan and Eric Goldsmith are the team behind AOL Pagetest and WebPagetest.org. AOL Pagetest is the Windows tool that works in IE. Pat took that and put it behind a web server running in his basement and called it WebPagetest. That was two years ago. He took the Open Source route and now there are instances of WebPagetest running in Virginia, California, UK, China, and New Zealand hosted by AOL as well as Strangeloop Networks, Aptimize, and Daemon Solutions.

The power of WebPagetest.org is that it’s web-based – you don’t have to do any installs and you can run it on any OS and browser. On the backend, WebPagetest runs the page in either IE7 or IE8 and displays the results. This might be a limitation for some folks – if you want to test a page on Mac OS X using Safari you’ll have to do that with some other tool. But the fact that IE 7&8 are the dominate browsers means you can see the most typical experience regardless of what platform you’re currently working on. Since many developers work on Mac using Safari or Firefox, and more are moving to Chrome, it’s important that they can easily see how their web pages load for a majority of their users.

New Test

Here’s how it works: Go to the New Test tab. Enter the URL you want to test and click submit. Pretty easy! 90% of the time that’s what I do, but there are other options you can tweak:

  • pick a geo location – VA, CA, UK, CN, or NZ
  • choose IE7 or IE8
  • choose a connection speed – Dial, DSL, FIOS (Dial and DSL are done via throttling)
  • test just the first (empty cache) page load or first and repeat
  • repeat the test up to 10 times to get a bigger sample size
  • opt to keep your test results private if desired
Results

The results page shows summary stats (page load times, bytes downloaded, # of HTTP requests) and a mini performance analysis (compression, image optimization, concatenating scripts and stylesheets). But the piece I love is the waterfall chart.

If you click on the mini waterfall, it takes you to a larger view where you can do additional customizations. I’ve been relying on this for my current series of blog posts on P3PC (performance of 3rd party content). And Pat even added a few options I requested. You can set the size of the image, remove certain requests (for example, I sometimes remove favicon.ico), and whether to show the extra bits on CPU and bandwidth utilization. I end up with clean waterfall charts like this:

And there’s more – Video!

When you create a new test, you can opt to record a video of the page loading (go to the Video tab under “Step 4 – Test Options” in the figure above). WebPagetest generates a filmstrip of images as well as a video. The image filmstrip shows what the page looks like as it loads. You can choose different time increments (0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 seconds). Wikipedia is pretty straightforward as it loads. Here’s the filmstrip for FOX Sports. Content arrives in the 0-5 second range, more images (like the logo) are filled in from 5-10 seconds, and flash arrives by the 15 second mark. You can also view the video.

Pat does a lot of this work on his own time and all the video features are in Alpha, so be tolerant. I use WebPagetest.org daily and it has become one of my favorite performance tools. Definitely give it a try.

Kategorien: Google Reader

// Friday fun: Let’s translate YUI3 to jQuery

I just came across this wonderful Gist on gitHub:

PLAIN TEXT JAVASCRIPT:
  1.  
  2. var $;
  3. YUI().use('*', function(Y){
  4.   $ = Y.get;
  5.   for(var p in Y) {
  6.       $[p] = Y[p];
  7.   }
  8. });
  9.  
  10. // test
  11. $('body').append("boo!");
  12.  

In case you want to use YUI3 but really really like jQuery syntax :) OK, it breaks the whole sandboxing idea of YUI3, but that's a small price to pay, right?

Kategorien: Google Reader
Inhalt abgleichen

// My tweets